html5 - Wrong controller action in rails form with link -

-

मेरे पास एक फ़ॉर्म है ... 

  = form_for_for_form_, url = & gt ; Update_path,: method = & gt; : क्या करें | फॉर्म | = Form.input_field: name = link_to image_tag asset_path ("icon.png"), {: नियंत्रक = & gt; 'नियंत्रक / नाम',: एक्शन = & gt; 'हटाएं',: id = & gt; Some.id} = form.submit

ऊपर के रूप में मेरे पास एक लिंक / इमेज / आइकन है, जो क्लिक पर कार्रवाई नियंत्रक को हटाना चाहिए, लेकिन किसी कारण से यह सूचकांक नियंत्रक को जाता है कार्रवाई। क्या कोई बात कर सकता है कि यहां क्या गलत है?

जब आप एक संसाधन मार्गों को परिभाषित करते हैं, तो हटाए जाने की क्रिया को उसी url के रूप में परिभाषित किया जाएगा जैसा कि अपडेट करें कार्रवाई (जो कि PUT या Patch HTTP क्रियाओं का उपयोग करके एक्सेस की जाती है), लेकिन इसे DELETE HTTP क्रिया का उपयोग करके एक्सेस किया जाता है < / P>

आपको बस अपने ऑब्जेक्ट के अपडेट पथ के लिंक को सेट करना है और इसके बजाय DELETE क्रिया का उपयोग करें: 

  = link_to image_tag ( "Icon.png"), update_path (id: some.id), विधि:: हटाएं

इसके अलावा, #asset_path के लिए कोई ज़रूरत नहीं है, मुझे लगता है


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

apache - 504 Gateway Time-out The server didn't respond in time. How to fix it? -

-
Using a form submission on an embedded iframe , the customer downloads a compressed log file Requested. The request was sent to the server, which is the compressed log files, perform some database operations and returns a compressed file. After just 2 minutes, 504 gateway time-out server did not respond timely message on browser net panel How to fix this error? The log files were taking a long time to compress, and timeout was set to 2min The error was fixed by extending the file file: # # timeout: The number of seconds before getting the time out. # # # Timeout 120 timeout 600
Read more

c# - .net WebSocket: CloseOutputAsync vs CloseAsync -

-
We have a working ASP.NET Web API REST service, which is one of the methods of our controller, HTTPTTEX. .) Socket handler code looks something like this ... Public async task socket handler (AspNetWebSocketContext context) {_webSocket = context.WebSocket; ... while (! Cts.IsCancellationRequested) {WebSocketReceiveResult Results = _webSocket.ReceiveAsync (Input Segment, cts.Token) .Result; WebSocketsStateCollusocketState = _webSocket.State; If (result.MessageType == WebSocketMessageType.Close || currentSocketState == WebSocketState.CloseReceived) {// What should I use. CloseAysnc () or. CloseOutputAsync ()? _webSocket.CloseOutputAsync (WebSocketCloseStatus.NormalClosure, "Client Requested", cts.Token). Wait (); } If (currentSocketState == WebSocketState.Open) {...}}} .What is the difference between .CooseAsync () and CloseOutputAysnc ()? I tried both of them and they both seemed to work fine but some difference should be the same they both describe very similar to...
Read more

c++ - How to properly scale qgroupbox title with stylesheet for high resolution display? -

-
I am trying to apply a stylesheet for QGroupBox (QT4.8), which works on the normal screen ( 96 dpi) high resolution screen (Yoga 2 Pro, 3200x1800, 275 dpi, windows 8.1). The following style looks good on the 275 dpi screen, but the top margins on a regular 96 dpi screen are far too big. QGroupBox {border: 1px solid red; Range radius: 7px; Margin-top: 12x; } QGroupBox :: Title {subcontrol-origin: margin; Subcontrol-position: left above; Padding-left: 10px; Padding-right: 10px; } Changing the top-margin has an effect, but I did not get a proper setting which works on both screens. If I shorten the value, the content of the group box overlaps with the title on 275 dpi screen. I was also playing with units "East", "PX", "MX", "PT". Reading the document I would have guessed, "2 X" was the correct solution, which should be scaled with different screen resolutions. Without the stylesheet, the groupbox works well on both screens. ...
Read more