asp.net mvc 3 - difference between OutputCache and MemoryCache -

-

मेरे पास asp.net mvc 3 अनुप्रयोग में एक नियंत्रक कार्रवाई है।

मेरी कार्रवाई में एक डीबी फ़ेचिंग ऑपरेशन और परिणाम को एक दृश्य में आउटपुट करता है। कैश में कार्रवाई परिणाम को स्टोर करने के लिए मैं आउटपुट कैश एक्शन फ़िल्टर विशेषता का उपयोग कर सकता हूं। मैं डीबी फ़ेचिंग ऑपरेशन के डेटा को स्टोर करने के लिए मेमोरीकैच क्लास का उपयोग भी कर सकता हूं। वे दोनों कैश से डेटा दिखाएंगे। आउटपुटकैच पूरे परिणाम को कैश में संग्रहीत करेगा। मेमोरी कैच क्लास डीबी फ़ेच परिणाम को कैश में संग्रहीत करेगा और एक्शन कैश से डेटा को एक ही नतीजे के लिए एक नया डीबी अनुरोध करने से प्राप्त करेगा।

मेरा सवाल है कि कौन से आवेदन करना बेहतर होगा? मुझे एक कटाई है कि आउटपुट कैश एक्शन फ़िल्टर विशेषता अच्छा काम करेगी क्योंकि यह दोनों डीबी फ़ेच परिणाम और एक्शन परिणाम कैश में संग्रहीत करेगा।


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

apache - 504 Gateway Time-out The server didn't respond in time. How to fix it? -

-
Using a form submission on an embedded iframe , the customer downloads a compressed log file Requested. The request was sent to the server, which is the compressed log files, perform some database operations and returns a compressed file. After just 2 minutes, 504 gateway time-out server did not respond timely message on browser net panel How to fix this error? The log files were taking a long time to compress, and timeout was set to 2min The error was fixed by extending the file file: # # timeout: The number of seconds before getting the time out. # # # Timeout 120 timeout 600
Read more

c# - .net WebSocket: CloseOutputAsync vs CloseAsync -

-
We have a working ASP.NET Web API REST service, which is one of the methods of our controller, HTTPTTEX. .) Socket handler code looks something like this ... Public async task socket handler (AspNetWebSocketContext context) {_webSocket = context.WebSocket; ... while (! Cts.IsCancellationRequested) {WebSocketReceiveResult Results = _webSocket.ReceiveAsync (Input Segment, cts.Token) .Result; WebSocketsStateCollusocketState = _webSocket.State; If (result.MessageType == WebSocketMessageType.Close || currentSocketState == WebSocketState.CloseReceived) {// What should I use. CloseAysnc () or. CloseOutputAsync ()? _webSocket.CloseOutputAsync (WebSocketCloseStatus.NormalClosure, "Client Requested", cts.Token). Wait (); } If (currentSocketState == WebSocketState.Open) {...}}} .What is the difference between .CooseAsync () and CloseOutputAysnc ()? I tried both of them and they both seemed to work fine but some difference should be the same they both describe very similar to...
Read more

c++ - How to properly scale qgroupbox title with stylesheet for high resolution display? -

-
I am trying to apply a stylesheet for QGroupBox (QT4.8), which works on the normal screen ( 96 dpi) high resolution screen (Yoga 2 Pro, 3200x1800, 275 dpi, windows 8.1). The following style looks good on the 275 dpi screen, but the top margins on a regular 96 dpi screen are far too big. QGroupBox {border: 1px solid red; Range radius: 7px; Margin-top: 12x; } QGroupBox :: Title {subcontrol-origin: margin; Subcontrol-position: left above; Padding-left: 10px; Padding-right: 10px; } Changing the top-margin has an effect, but I did not get a proper setting which works on both screens. If I shorten the value, the content of the group box overlaps with the title on 275 dpi screen. I was also playing with units "East", "PX", "MX", "PT". Reading the document I would have guessed, "2 X" was the correct solution, which should be scaled with different screen resolutions. Without the stylesheet, the groupbox works well on both screens. ...
Read more