message - Is messaging from two pools to one pool allowed in BPMN? -


I have three pools, sender A (a human work), B (a service function) and receiver C (no case ). The pools are asynchronous and there is no callback.

Both pool A and B have to send message 1 to pool the C-startme's event.

Is it a legitimate use for sending messages from sources in many ways? A receiver or do I duplicate the message and two start-up events?

BPMN Speak Says Yes , it's valid (page 2.0 version) 246): "An initial event may be the target for the message flow, there may be zero (0) or more incoming message flows. An immediate mechanism for the message flow process to target an initial event (a Trigger). To start a new process, only one trigger is needed. (In your case you have a type of message 'Message1', then it is straightforward, just as it says. If you have different messages, then Speak is given the "Multiple Event" - which allows many event definitions behind the scenes - or as an option, you will need to display those separate messages for the initial event separately in the picture.)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

HTML/CSS - Automatically set height width from background image? -

php - Mysql Show Process - Sleep Commands and what to do -

c - What is the address of buf (the local variable in the main function)? -