google apps script - Lock Service getScriptLock() does it work in libraries -

-

I am creating a script library which will be used by several other scripts. These scripts will run together and I need to control access to a resource, access to a spreadsheet.

The documentation is not entirely clear to me. Example LockService.getPublicLock (); refers to the method. I have created a library to test LockService in which there is a method that receives a lock:

This.doTest = function (testClient ) {Var lock = LockService.getScriptLock (), success; 

  try {lock.waitLock (1000); Logger.log (testClient + 'received lock'); Utilities.sleep (2000); Lock.releaseLock (); } Hold (e) {Logger.log (testclient + 'lock could not be obtained after 2 seconds'.); }   
} 
 
 The test library is used in two other test scripts. If I run test scripts, then both scripts sometimes fail to get a lock. This is what I want to see. 
 
 But the example in the documentation refers to another method and the library has been used in various scripts, I would like to ensure that this is what it is supposed to do to work. 
 
 The question is whether the script lock works in the entire library and it will lock the code segment without using the library in separate scripts. And are there any other issues that I should be worried about?

I believe you are right in your assumption: the lock instance used in the library The script will be shared by everyone, at least this script is using my library.

If you look at it, and scroll down to the shared and non-shared resources table, you will see that lock is an non-shared resource , Which has been explained as table footnote

This means that the library has its own example of the resource / feature and that all the scripts that share the library and that Access to the same frequency

The grave of that section If rather confusing, I should say, with the 'share' and 'non-shared' concepts not explained very well. But the essence of this is: Unless your lock is created in the library code, all the scripts using that library will take the same example of the lock.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

apache - 504 Gateway Time-out The server didn't respond in time. How to fix it? -

-
Using a form submission on an embedded iframe , the customer downloads a compressed log file Requested. The request was sent to the server, which is the compressed log files, perform some database operations and returns a compressed file. After just 2 minutes, 504 gateway time-out server did not respond timely message on browser net panel How to fix this error? The log files were taking a long time to compress, and timeout was set to 2min The error was fixed by extending the file file: # # timeout: The number of seconds before getting the time out. # # # Timeout 120 timeout 600
Read more

c# - .net WebSocket: CloseOutputAsync vs CloseAsync -

-
We have a working ASP.NET Web API REST service, which is one of the methods of our controller, HTTPTTEX. .) Socket handler code looks something like this ... Public async task socket handler (AspNetWebSocketContext context) {_webSocket = context.WebSocket; ... while (! Cts.IsCancellationRequested) {WebSocketReceiveResult Results = _webSocket.ReceiveAsync (Input Segment, cts.Token) .Result; WebSocketsStateCollusocketState = _webSocket.State; If (result.MessageType == WebSocketMessageType.Close || currentSocketState == WebSocketState.CloseReceived) {// What should I use. CloseAysnc () or. CloseOutputAsync ()? _webSocket.CloseOutputAsync (WebSocketCloseStatus.NormalClosure, "Client Requested", cts.Token). Wait (); } If (currentSocketState == WebSocketState.Open) {...}}} .What is the difference between .CooseAsync () and CloseOutputAysnc ()? I tried both of them and they both seemed to work fine but some difference should be the same they both describe very similar to...
Read more

c++ - How to properly scale qgroupbox title with stylesheet for high resolution display? -

-
I am trying to apply a stylesheet for QGroupBox (QT4.8), which works on the normal screen ( 96 dpi) high resolution screen (Yoga 2 Pro, 3200x1800, 275 dpi, windows 8.1). The following style looks good on the 275 dpi screen, but the top margins on a regular 96 dpi screen are far too big. QGroupBox {border: 1px solid red; Range radius: 7px; Margin-top: 12x; } QGroupBox :: Title {subcontrol-origin: margin; Subcontrol-position: left above; Padding-left: 10px; Padding-right: 10px; } Changing the top-margin has an effect, but I did not get a proper setting which works on both screens. If I shorten the value, the content of the group box overlaps with the title on 275 dpi screen. I was also playing with units "East", "PX", "MX", "PT". Reading the document I would have guessed, "2 X" was the correct solution, which should be scaled with different screen resolutions. Without the stylesheet, the groupbox works well on both screens. ...
Read more