azure - Load balancing stateful web application -

-

I am trying to scale a web app from a web frequency to several instances on multiple scale The web app makes proper processing of the user per user, it is also quite interactive so the latency is important. At present we have a database, the test has shown that this is not an obstacle, so assume the question that we do not have to worry about scaling, all the examples will kill the same database. In this situation, I think that the per-user load balance is the best option, because the per-user status will be repeated in the per-user position in many web instances. In addition to the issue of maintaining continuity, I am worried that there will be consequences of unacceptable latency for end users.

It says that ARR balances per-user load by default on Ezur. However, the traffic manager who I can collect is automatically enabled when you spin multiple web instances at Ezur, balancing the counter-request load.

So my question is, which of these two load balances if I add some more examples to my web hosting plan, then I will use the plans? If I have to disable the traffic manager manually, what is the best way to do this?

Calum - You can take advantage of a standard SQL session state provider in auction or you can get the AZR redisce cash provider Users can also view store support for user session status.

When Cloud Services Web Rules are deployed, you get auto load balancer example in front of your host. In addition to the configuration of endpoint, it is relatively transparent. Each new added / deleted auto-scaled event is added to the cloud service and the load balancer is automatically added / removed.

As others have said, Azure Traffic Manager provides a high level of service which can be found here.

A good overview of load balancing can be found here:

< / Div>

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

apache - 504 Gateway Time-out The server didn't respond in time. How to fix it? -

-
Using a form submission on an embedded iframe , the customer downloads a compressed log file Requested. The request was sent to the server, which is the compressed log files, perform some database operations and returns a compressed file. After just 2 minutes, 504 gateway time-out server did not respond timely message on browser net panel How to fix this error? The log files were taking a long time to compress, and timeout was set to 2min The error was fixed by extending the file file: # # timeout: The number of seconds before getting the time out. # # # Timeout 120 timeout 600
Read more

c# - .net WebSocket: CloseOutputAsync vs CloseAsync -

-
We have a working ASP.NET Web API REST service, which is one of the methods of our controller, HTTPTTEX. .) Socket handler code looks something like this ... Public async task socket handler (AspNetWebSocketContext context) {_webSocket = context.WebSocket; ... while (! Cts.IsCancellationRequested) {WebSocketReceiveResult Results = _webSocket.ReceiveAsync (Input Segment, cts.Token) .Result; WebSocketsStateCollusocketState = _webSocket.State; If (result.MessageType == WebSocketMessageType.Close || currentSocketState == WebSocketState.CloseReceived) {// What should I use. CloseAysnc () or. CloseOutputAsync ()? _webSocket.CloseOutputAsync (WebSocketCloseStatus.NormalClosure, "Client Requested", cts.Token). Wait (); } If (currentSocketState == WebSocketState.Open) {...}}} .What is the difference between .CooseAsync () and CloseOutputAysnc ()? I tried both of them and they both seemed to work fine but some difference should be the same they both describe very similar to...
Read more

c++ - How to properly scale qgroupbox title with stylesheet for high resolution display? -

-
I am trying to apply a stylesheet for QGroupBox (QT4.8), which works on the normal screen ( 96 dpi) high resolution screen (Yoga 2 Pro, 3200x1800, 275 dpi, windows 8.1). The following style looks good on the 275 dpi screen, but the top margins on a regular 96 dpi screen are far too big. QGroupBox {border: 1px solid red; Range radius: 7px; Margin-top: 12x; } QGroupBox :: Title {subcontrol-origin: margin; Subcontrol-position: left above; Padding-left: 10px; Padding-right: 10px; } Changing the top-margin has an effect, but I did not get a proper setting which works on both screens. If I shorten the value, the content of the group box overlaps with the title on 275 dpi screen. I was also playing with units "East", "PX", "MX", "PT". Reading the document I would have guessed, "2 X" was the correct solution, which should be scaled with different screen resolutions. Without the stylesheet, the groupbox works well on both screens. ...
Read more