ios - XCode 6.1 creates provisioning profiles that are EXPIRED on testflight -

-

I want to deploy testflight which currently tells me that my provisioning profile has ended.

XCode 6.1 automatically generates such a provision profile that looks like this:

e.g. XC: * and XC: bundle. Identifier

And despite setting up against my team, despite the installation of my UIDID, I do not see any device.

When I have an app (expected to start using TasFlight) to connect to iTunes, this provision profile has made it difficult:

I thought I could correct it with my own Adjacp provision profile , And so I created one:

adhoc provision profile exists

< P> and yaki me That it was setup to use it for the release profile:

Edok Provisioning Profile Setup to use

But I still see the same provisioning profile being deposited:

I have also tried:

  1. Deleting all the profile profiles from my device .
  2. Apple Developer Area Sector delete all provisions profile.

I think there is no control over (1) that the provision profile on an iTunes connectivity verification / submission has been selected, and (2) in the automatically generated XC provision profile There is no ability to keep the equipment against any one.

How can I fix this?

Edit

  1. I have read somewhere that this will happen
  2. And I understand that I was trying to implement an EdoZ provisioning profile incorrectly.
  3. I tested another device and it was "finished" Although it was not working, loading was crashed immediately after the screen.
  4. I was able to adjust an IPA for my own device. (This leaves the step in which it appears to end on the testflight.) However, unfortunately, it also crashes if I do this.

    5. There were two problems:

    1. This was because the build was displayed on the testfire as an expier that I needed to change the language of my device "English (UK)", maybe it matches build ...

    2. Due to the crash, the compilation of the Swift code looks like a bug in XCode 6.1.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

apache - 504 Gateway Time-out The server didn't respond in time. How to fix it? -

-
Using a form submission on an embedded iframe , the customer downloads a compressed log file Requested. The request was sent to the server, which is the compressed log files, perform some database operations and returns a compressed file. After just 2 minutes, 504 gateway time-out server did not respond timely message on browser net panel How to fix this error? The log files were taking a long time to compress, and timeout was set to 2min The error was fixed by extending the file file: # # timeout: The number of seconds before getting the time out. # # # Timeout 120 timeout 600
Read more

c# - .net WebSocket: CloseOutputAsync vs CloseAsync -

-
We have a working ASP.NET Web API REST service, which is one of the methods of our controller, HTTPTTEX. .) Socket handler code looks something like this ... Public async task socket handler (AspNetWebSocketContext context) {_webSocket = context.WebSocket; ... while (! Cts.IsCancellationRequested) {WebSocketReceiveResult Results = _webSocket.ReceiveAsync (Input Segment, cts.Token) .Result; WebSocketsStateCollusocketState = _webSocket.State; If (result.MessageType == WebSocketMessageType.Close || currentSocketState == WebSocketState.CloseReceived) {// What should I use. CloseAysnc () or. CloseOutputAsync ()? _webSocket.CloseOutputAsync (WebSocketCloseStatus.NormalClosure, "Client Requested", cts.Token). Wait (); } If (currentSocketState == WebSocketState.Open) {...}}} .What is the difference between .CooseAsync () and CloseOutputAysnc ()? I tried both of them and they both seemed to work fine but some difference should be the same they both describe very similar to...
Read more

c++ - How to properly scale qgroupbox title with stylesheet for high resolution display? -

-
I am trying to apply a stylesheet for QGroupBox (QT4.8), which works on the normal screen ( 96 dpi) high resolution screen (Yoga 2 Pro, 3200x1800, 275 dpi, windows 8.1). The following style looks good on the 275 dpi screen, but the top margins on a regular 96 dpi screen are far too big. QGroupBox {border: 1px solid red; Range radius: 7px; Margin-top: 12x; } QGroupBox :: Title {subcontrol-origin: margin; Subcontrol-position: left above; Padding-left: 10px; Padding-right: 10px; } Changing the top-margin has an effect, but I did not get a proper setting which works on both screens. If I shorten the value, the content of the group box overlaps with the title on 275 dpi screen. I was also playing with units "East", "PX", "MX", "PT". Reading the document I would have guessed, "2 X" was the correct solution, which should be scaled with different screen resolutions. Without the stylesheet, the groupbox works well on both screens. ...
Read more