vbscript - QTP or selenium or something else? -

-

I'm partly a QA Automation / partially web developer, mostly QTP / VBScript for automation
I am moving forward in the form of automation architects on a new project soon.
I have a holistic approach and idea for the automation framework, that I want to develop, ready in my mind, I need some help on deciding on automation equipment. I would like to use the QPP because I will be able to use the full library for my current project less level tasks.

One thing where I feel restrained with QPP 'Cross Browser' Support, I think IE can be best targeted only with QTP, Firefox Support for Chrome / Chrome is still a little limited. Also, multiple browsers do not allow QPP testing at a time. (I'm probably mistaken, the latest QTP version is probably supporting it, and if so, I would appreciate it if you can share your experience)
Our goal applications will be mostly web applications and web platform targets IE / Chrome / Firefox / Safari / Opera

So, I'm thinking of giving a try to Selenium or Adventurers as a web developer, I can say that I am good in javascript, So being selenium friendly should not be a big change for me.

Before shedding my hands with Selenium, I want to hear the views of the expert community here.

How do you feel, how well your cross browser 'automation experience is with Selenium / Sahi, or your complaint is the problem of selenium.
How much selenium will be useful about it, such as the opening of the door to the VBscripting world for automation developers, we like the flexibility of QTP - we have VBScripts, system level scripting, or networking related scripting or IE settings programming, runtime Many scripts that support DLL registration or other batch can extend files, database linking (ADODB), Using 3rd party API / Web API etc, XML programming, NAT libraries etc. is using.

Thank you, in advance, very much appreciate sharing your valuable experience.

While this is a debate, I, from my experience, say, SELENIUM there definitely There are some advantages of using QTP. However, developing selenium is a very good tool with the technology running. Here's a big factor to keep OOP's ability to apply and take advantage of it, where qtp fails easily. Thinking angular angular, other AJAX technology where selenium is improving day-to-day and not QTT. And, think of working with the top team with developers, who are making your app with Java / C #, you can share knowledge and techniques equally to support your project equally. , Where your project will be completely separated using QTT. And, in any case if you need help with winning Google Selenium without any doubt.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

apache - 504 Gateway Time-out The server didn't respond in time. How to fix it? -

-
Using a form submission on an embedded iframe , the customer downloads a compressed log file Requested. The request was sent to the server, which is the compressed log files, perform some database operations and returns a compressed file. After just 2 minutes, 504 gateway time-out server did not respond timely message on browser net panel How to fix this error? The log files were taking a long time to compress, and timeout was set to 2min The error was fixed by extending the file file: # # timeout: The number of seconds before getting the time out. # # # Timeout 120 timeout 600
Read more

c# - .net WebSocket: CloseOutputAsync vs CloseAsync -

-
We have a working ASP.NET Web API REST service, which is one of the methods of our controller, HTTPTTEX. .) Socket handler code looks something like this ... Public async task socket handler (AspNetWebSocketContext context) {_webSocket = context.WebSocket; ... while (! Cts.IsCancellationRequested) {WebSocketReceiveResult Results = _webSocket.ReceiveAsync (Input Segment, cts.Token) .Result; WebSocketsStateCollusocketState = _webSocket.State; If (result.MessageType == WebSocketMessageType.Close || currentSocketState == WebSocketState.CloseReceived) {// What should I use. CloseAysnc () or. CloseOutputAsync ()? _webSocket.CloseOutputAsync (WebSocketCloseStatus.NormalClosure, "Client Requested", cts.Token). Wait (); } If (currentSocketState == WebSocketState.Open) {...}}} .What is the difference between .CooseAsync () and CloseOutputAysnc ()? I tried both of them and they both seemed to work fine but some difference should be the same they both describe very similar to...
Read more

c++ - How to properly scale qgroupbox title with stylesheet for high resolution display? -

-
I am trying to apply a stylesheet for QGroupBox (QT4.8), which works on the normal screen ( 96 dpi) high resolution screen (Yoga 2 Pro, 3200x1800, 275 dpi, windows 8.1). The following style looks good on the 275 dpi screen, but the top margins on a regular 96 dpi screen are far too big. QGroupBox {border: 1px solid red; Range radius: 7px; Margin-top: 12x; } QGroupBox :: Title {subcontrol-origin: margin; Subcontrol-position: left above; Padding-left: 10px; Padding-right: 10px; } Changing the top-margin has an effect, but I did not get a proper setting which works on both screens. If I shorten the value, the content of the group box overlaps with the title on 275 dpi screen. I was also playing with units "East", "PX", "MX", "PT". Reading the document I would have guessed, "2 X" was the correct solution, which should be scaled with different screen resolutions. Without the stylesheet, the groupbox works well on both screens. ...
Read more