html - My responsive images are overlapping my header. -

-

Hey I've created a JSfield to show you the problem My text is overlapping by my responsive images I want to That they sit above the text and do not do this.

This is my CSS for images and problems:

.page-header .logo img {status: complete; Limit: 2px solid RGBA (0, 0, 0, .3)! Important; Top: 45%; Left: 35.5%; Width: 30%; Height: 30%; } .page-header h1 {margin: 30px 50px 10px; } .text-centre {text-align: center; } .page-header h1 {margin: 30px 50px 10px; } H1 {margin: 0 30px; Font-size: 54px; Font-weight: 300; Color: # 555; }. Page header image {width: 100%; Height: auto; }. Page Header {Status: Relative; Margin: -50px-50px35px; Padding: 0 35px; Border bottom: 1px solid # e6e6e6; }

Honestly, your code is a mess I'm not sure what you can achieve Trying to do it, but I will try to explain what I can do.

Your logo has full position, which allows it to stay on top of the slider, but because it is% for its location and size, it is difficult to prevent it from growing or growing in size by saying ... Your logo basically has a size and position relative to the container size and that container & lt; Div class = "logo" & gt; does not have a fixed width or height, the size depends on its container which is the page header ... and it also does not have a fixed width or height, so it is relative to the body.

You have many solutions. The first and the best option is to clean your code and actually decide on a fixed location / size for the logo or logo container.

Second, in order to inject a new division, which is the relative position but the logo is the same size, in this way, if the logo grows in size, the newly created invisible divas will also increase the content by pushing So that it is not overlapping by the logo.

Of course, keep in mind that because the location of your logo is% base (top: 45% etc.), the newly created division will move the logo because the size of the body will increase (container for everyone). Your logo will also be extended to%


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

apache - 504 Gateway Time-out The server didn't respond in time. How to fix it? -

-
Using a form submission on an embedded iframe , the customer downloads a compressed log file Requested. The request was sent to the server, which is the compressed log files, perform some database operations and returns a compressed file. After just 2 minutes, 504 gateway time-out server did not respond timely message on browser net panel How to fix this error? The log files were taking a long time to compress, and timeout was set to 2min The error was fixed by extending the file file: # # timeout: The number of seconds before getting the time out. # # # Timeout 120 timeout 600
Read more

c# - .net WebSocket: CloseOutputAsync vs CloseAsync -

-
We have a working ASP.NET Web API REST service, which is one of the methods of our controller, HTTPTTEX. .) Socket handler code looks something like this ... Public async task socket handler (AspNetWebSocketContext context) {_webSocket = context.WebSocket; ... while (! Cts.IsCancellationRequested) {WebSocketReceiveResult Results = _webSocket.ReceiveAsync (Input Segment, cts.Token) .Result; WebSocketsStateCollusocketState = _webSocket.State; If (result.MessageType == WebSocketMessageType.Close || currentSocketState == WebSocketState.CloseReceived) {// What should I use. CloseAysnc () or. CloseOutputAsync ()? _webSocket.CloseOutputAsync (WebSocketCloseStatus.NormalClosure, "Client Requested", cts.Token). Wait (); } If (currentSocketState == WebSocketState.Open) {...}}} .What is the difference between .CooseAsync () and CloseOutputAysnc ()? I tried both of them and they both seemed to work fine but some difference should be the same they both describe very similar to...
Read more

c++ - How to properly scale qgroupbox title with stylesheet for high resolution display? -

-
I am trying to apply a stylesheet for QGroupBox (QT4.8), which works on the normal screen ( 96 dpi) high resolution screen (Yoga 2 Pro, 3200x1800, 275 dpi, windows 8.1). The following style looks good on the 275 dpi screen, but the top margins on a regular 96 dpi screen are far too big. QGroupBox {border: 1px solid red; Range radius: 7px; Margin-top: 12x; } QGroupBox :: Title {subcontrol-origin: margin; Subcontrol-position: left above; Padding-left: 10px; Padding-right: 10px; } Changing the top-margin has an effect, but I did not get a proper setting which works on both screens. If I shorten the value, the content of the group box overlaps with the title on 275 dpi screen. I was also playing with units "East", "PX", "MX", "PT". Reading the document I would have guessed, "2 X" was the correct solution, which should be scaled with different screen resolutions. Without the stylesheet, the groupbox works well on both screens. ...
Read more