Hazelcast Near-Cache not working -

-

I am currently working on integrating hezelcast in our system and trying out caching, but I can go to this issue.

I'm configuring hezelcast via spring with my configuration: 

  & lt; Hz: hazelcast id = "instance" & gt; & Lt; Hertz: config & gt; & Lt; Hertz: Management-enabled center = "true" url = "sanitized" update-interval = "5" /> & Lt; Hz: network port = "5701" & gt; & Lt; Hertz: Joining & gt; & Lt; Hz: multicast enabled = "wrong" /> & Lt; Hz: tcp-ip enabled = "true" & gt; & Lt; Hz: Members & gt; # {SystemProperties ['hazelcast.members']} & lt; / Hz: Members & gt; & Lt; / Hertz: TCP-IP & gt; & Lt; / Hertz: Joining & gt; & Lt; Hertz: Interface & gt; & Lt; Hertz: Interface & gt; 192.168.24 * & lt; / Hz:. Interface & gt; & Lt; / Hertz: Interface & gt; & Lt; / Hertz: Networks & gt; & Lt; Hertz: Map name = "default" merge-policy = "package.CustomMergePolicy" & gt; & Lt ;! - near the cache with default values ​​- & gt; & Lt; Hz: pass-cache cache-local-entries = "incorrect" removal-policy = "LRU" in-memory-format = "binary" invalid-on-conversion = "right" maximum-inactive-seconds = "0" Size = "0" time-to-live-seconds = "0" /> & Lt; / Hertz: map & gt; & Lt; / Hertz: config & gt; & Lt; / Hz: hazelcast & gt;

The first node has been started throw the following warning 

  November 4, 2014 4:46:23 PM com.hazelcast.map.operation.InvalidateNearCacheOperation Warning : [1 92.168.24.26]: 5701 [Dev] [3.3.1] Cash Clear Operation has been accepted, while Cash near cash is accepted. CISLSASTActivityPlus is not enabled for Maps. Possible configuration conflict between nodes.

Both nodes have the same exact configuration (configuration packs and copied in both nodes).

Why is any thoughts happening?

EDIT: Further testing has shown that the warning is always being displayed on the first node that has been started (even if the node test is in progress). In addition, using the management center, we have confirmed that both nodes have the same configuration, but it seems that the first node is going to start, some maps are not activating near caching.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

apache - 504 Gateway Time-out The server didn't respond in time. How to fix it? -

-
Using a form submission on an embedded iframe , the customer downloads a compressed log file Requested. The request was sent to the server, which is the compressed log files, perform some database operations and returns a compressed file. After just 2 minutes, 504 gateway time-out server did not respond timely message on browser net panel How to fix this error? The log files were taking a long time to compress, and timeout was set to 2min The error was fixed by extending the file file: # # timeout: The number of seconds before getting the time out. # # # Timeout 120 timeout 600
Read more

c# - .net WebSocket: CloseOutputAsync vs CloseAsync -

-
We have a working ASP.NET Web API REST service, which is one of the methods of our controller, HTTPTTEX. .) Socket handler code looks something like this ... Public async task socket handler (AspNetWebSocketContext context) {_webSocket = context.WebSocket; ... while (! Cts.IsCancellationRequested) {WebSocketReceiveResult Results = _webSocket.ReceiveAsync (Input Segment, cts.Token) .Result; WebSocketsStateCollusocketState = _webSocket.State; If (result.MessageType == WebSocketMessageType.Close || currentSocketState == WebSocketState.CloseReceived) {// What should I use. CloseAysnc () or. CloseOutputAsync ()? _webSocket.CloseOutputAsync (WebSocketCloseStatus.NormalClosure, "Client Requested", cts.Token). Wait (); } If (currentSocketState == WebSocketState.Open) {...}}} .What is the difference between .CooseAsync () and CloseOutputAysnc ()? I tried both of them and they both seemed to work fine but some difference should be the same they both describe very similar to...
Read more

c++ - How to properly scale qgroupbox title with stylesheet for high resolution display? -

-
I am trying to apply a stylesheet for QGroupBox (QT4.8), which works on the normal screen ( 96 dpi) high resolution screen (Yoga 2 Pro, 3200x1800, 275 dpi, windows 8.1). The following style looks good on the 275 dpi screen, but the top margins on a regular 96 dpi screen are far too big. QGroupBox {border: 1px solid red; Range radius: 7px; Margin-top: 12x; } QGroupBox :: Title {subcontrol-origin: margin; Subcontrol-position: left above; Padding-left: 10px; Padding-right: 10px; } Changing the top-margin has an effect, but I did not get a proper setting which works on both screens. If I shorten the value, the content of the group box overlaps with the title on 275 dpi screen. I was also playing with units "East", "PX", "MX", "PT". Reading the document I would have guessed, "2 X" was the correct solution, which should be scaled with different screen resolutions. Without the stylesheet, the groupbox works well on both screens. ...
Read more